Normal view
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- What’s behind the AI industry’s latest warnings of doom?
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- Obama urges Democrats to have a ‘clear plan’ for AI safeguards
Obama urges Democrats to have a ‘clear plan’ for AI safeguards
-
AI Infrastructure Archives - The New Stack
- “Machine translation is still broken for most of the world’s languages”: Cohere builds non-reasoning for a reason
“Machine translation is still broken for most of the world’s languages”: Cohere builds non-reasoning for a reason
Enterprise AI company Cohere announced North Small Translate last week, a mixture-of-experts (MOE) open-weight machine translation model that works across 50 languages.
Developers can download the weights for noncommercial use under CC BY-NC 4.0. Cohere offers commercially licensed deployment through Model Vault, which is a Cohere-managed inference environment. Cohere positions the model as part of its sovereign AI strategy, aimed at organizations that want greater control over where their models run and how their data is handled.
North Small Translate builds on Cohere’s multilingual and translation lineage, which includes its Tiny Aya and Command A Translate model families. The company claims North Small Translate outperforms “similarly sized open-weight models” under 1T parameters, as well as API-based translation models in various dimensions of machine translation on average.
Cohere co-founder Nick Frosst tells The New Stack that the model’s efficiency draws from the fact that it is non-reasoning, i.e., it relies on learned statistical patterns without a step-by-step logic process, which means it uses fewer tokens.
Machine translation is still broken for most of the world’s languages
“We spent nine years scaling an architecture invented to fix translation, and machine translation is still broken for most of the world’s languages,” Frosst says. “General-purpose models get you most of the way and then stop. The next phase of enterprise AI in this space is smaller, more specialized, and runs inside your own walls.”
“…machine translation is still broken for most of the world’s languages.”
In Cohere’s reported evaluation using WMT26 benchmarks, the company states that North Small Translate leads with a WMT26 All Languages benchmark score of 83.60, compared with 81.56 for Qwen 3.5 397B A17B, 76.50 for GLM 5.2 FP8, 81.37 for DeepL NextGen, 79.46 for Gemma 4 31B (on), and 68.20 for Google Translate.
With its mixture-of-experts architecture and 218 billion total parameters, with 25 billion active. Cohere points to North Small Translate’s smaller compute & memory footprint than other models. Some model-to-model comparisons in this space aren’t fully substantiable, since not every vendor discloses parameter counts.
With current solutions, long documents start to fall apart
“Machine translation allows documents to be translated from one language to another automatically. With current solutions, long documents start to fall apart,” Frosst says. “Google Translate scores 21.3 on our long-context test, Gemma 4 31B 19.4; we score 48.9. That’s [for example] a safety manual that reads fine on page one… and has drifted by page ten. The other risk is where the text goes. Once you push HR policies or regulated documents through a third-party API, that data has left your building, and necessarily that means your control over it is diminished.”
“The risk [in machine translation] is where the text goes. Once you push HR policies or regulated documents through a third-party API, that data has left your building and necessarily that means your control over it is diminished.”
Explaining why the model offers “stronger translation performance” across complex enterprise translation tasks, Frosst says the model can support work spanning “a high volume” of sensitive documents.
As well as its 50 languages (32 ‘high-resource’ languages + 18 others), the Cohere team explains that the model also supports translation-workflow-focused capabilities, such as structured translations (i.e., Markdown or JSON documents), instruction following (i.e., recommended tone & format), and terminology guides (i.e., providing specific vocabulary to use in the translation), all as part of the model.
“North Small Translate works with a multi-pass workflow,” explains Frosst. “The model translates, reviews its own output, finds errors, and fixes them – and this is the same loop we used in training. We ship both because standard is one pass and built for volume, while the agentic [version] spends more tokens for 84.36 against 83.60 on WMT26. That difference ends up being worth it when the document is a contract or a safety procedure, for instance, but in other cases you’d rather optimize for efficiency.”
“The model translates, reviews its own output, finds errors and fixes them.”
Model ‘steerability’ drives suggesting language tone and formatting
This model uses the same architecture as prior Cohere models but improves performance through post-training advances, including reinforcement learning and new datasets, specifically for machine translation tasks.
Frosst concludes that, across the translation model marketplace, generative machine translation models offer the highest quality and steerability (i.e., suggesting tone, formatting, etc.) but typically cost much more than Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models commonly used in commercial use cases.
North Small Translate was developed in partnership with RWS, an AI solutions company pioneering in language technology and services. Collaboration with RWS, specifically with its Language Weaver research and science teams along with its language experts, helped shape the model’s real-world translation performance throughout development.
As noted above, developers can access the weights free of charge for non-commercial use in three quantizations. There is also a Hugging Face Space and an API for those who lack the required hardware.
The post “Machine translation is still broken for most of the world’s languages”: Cohere builds non-reasoning for a reason appeared first on The New Stack.
Altman, Musk, and Hassabis back Amodei's call to add independent oversight
![]()
Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Demis Hassabis back Dario Amodei's call to slow down AI development, at least in part. Altman says OpenAI is pushing its IPO to 2027 over safety concerns.
The article Altman, Musk, and Hassabis back Amodei's call to add independent oversight appeared first on The Decoder.
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- OpenAI’s Sam Altman says it would be ‘ill-advised’ to go public in 2026
OpenAI’s Sam Altman says it would be ‘ill-advised’ to go public in 2026
Anthropic CEO outlines plan to slow AI development
-
THE DECODER
- GPT-6 Astra appears to show a "step change" in spatial reasoning based on early benchmarks
GPT-6 Astra appears to show a "step change" in spatial reasoning based on early benchmarks
![]()
In a new robotics benchmark, GPT-6 Astra shows major gains in spatial understanding. On StationeryBench, the model completed 7 out of 100 tasks with dual-arm robots, while competitor MolmoAct2 couldn't finish a single one. A researcher calls it a "step change in spatial reasoning."
The article GPT-6 Astra appears to show a "step change" in spatial reasoning based on early benchmarks appeared first on The Decoder.
GPT-6 Astra needs leaner prompts and fewer guardrails, OpenAI recommends
![]()
Overly long skill descriptions, blanket reading requirements, and rigid approval rules can get in GPT-6 Astra's way, warns OpenAI's Eric Provencher. More capable models need less hand-holding, so developers should tie instructions to specific tasks and spell out when the job is done.
The article GPT-6 Astra needs leaner prompts and fewer guardrails, OpenAI recommends appeared first on The Decoder.
-
THE DECODER
- OpenAI agents launched a 2,000-package cyberattack on RubyGems just to collect data anyone could Google
OpenAI agents launched a 2,000-package cyberattack on RubyGems just to collect data anyone could Google
![]()
In May 2026, OpenAI agents uploaded more than 2,000 malicious packages to RubyGems, found an unknown security vulnerability on their own, and tried to steal API keys. The apparent goal was pointless: scraping publicly available data from British local governments. OpenAI reportedly never told those affected.
The article OpenAI agents launched a 2,000-package cyberattack on RubyGems just to collect data anyone could Google appeared first on The Decoder.
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- Mecka AI nears $500M valuation in Sequoia-led deal amid rush for robot training data
Mecka AI nears $500M valuation in Sequoia-led deal amid rush for robot training data
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- Y Combinator’s Garry Tan wants US open-weight AI labs to ‘distill’ frontier models, too
Y Combinator’s Garry Tan wants US open-weight AI labs to ‘distill’ frontier models, too
OpenAI’s feud with mathematicians is only escalating
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- One week left to book your exhibit table at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026
One week left to book your exhibit table at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- Final, final, final call for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 Side Events
Final, final, final call for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 Side Events
Roundtables: Could AI really kill us all?
Employees at the world’s leading AI labs are saying there’s a real possibility that advanced AI could destroy humanity. Are they right? Or is this more scaremongering and hype? Join MIT Technology Review executive editor Niall Firth for a conversation with senior AI editor Will Douglas Heaven and AI reporter Grace Huckins unpacking AI extinction fears: where they come from, whether they hold any water, and, if so, what we should do.
Going live on Tuesday, September 15 at 16:00 BST / 11:00am EST / 8:00am PST
Speakers: Niall Firth, executive editor, Will Douglas Heaven, senior AI editor, and Grace Huckins, AI reporter
Related Stories
Kimi-maker Moonshot AI targets $2B in annual revenue
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- An Anthropic researcher’s doomsday warning comes at a very interesting time
An Anthropic researcher’s doomsday warning comes at a very interesting time
-
THE DECODER
- Ex-Deepmind VP Vinyals says AI self-improvement is coming but won't trigger an intelligence explosion
Ex-Deepmind VP Vinyals says AI self-improvement is coming but won't trigger an intelligence explosion
![]()
Oriol Vinyals, until recently head of research at Google DeepMind, thinks a sudden AI intelligence explosion through recursive self-improvement is unlikely. AI can speed up research by a factor of ten, he says, but it hits two bottlenecks: coming up with ideas ("research taste") and reliably judging results. Reward hacking and the speed of light add further limits. Vinyals now wants to tackle these bottlenecks with his startup Discovery Loop, co-founded with Jeff Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, and Quoc Le.
The article Ex-Deepmind VP Vinyals says AI self-improvement is coming but won't trigger an intelligence explosion appeared first on The Decoder.
-
AI News & Artificial Intelligence | TechCrunch
- Nscale adds former OpenAI exec Fidji Simo to its board ahead of potential IPO
Nscale adds former OpenAI exec Fidji Simo to its board ahead of potential IPO
Coding Agents Don't Need Longer History — They Need Intent Continuity
I built a system that automatically discovers, verifies, and applies relevant requirements from earlier interactions without asking the user where they came from.
The post Coding Agents Don't Need Longer History — They Need Intent Continuity appeared first on Towards Data Science.